[ds6-devel] no more objections

[Chris Leishman]

On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 01:08 AM, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Chris Leishman wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 12:27 AM, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what the point of 1) and 2) is.  Do we really care if
>>> getaddrinfo returns IPv4 mapped addresses?
>>
>> yes. for security reasons, we should drop IPv4 mapped addresses  
>> returned
>> by getaddrinfo. see draft-itojun-
>
> ooops, forgot to add the link:
>
> http://playground.iijlab.net/i-d/draft-itojun-ipv6-transition-abuse- 
> 01.txt
>
> i have found also these two new docs:
>
> ftp://ftp.itojun.org/pub/paper/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful- 
> 01.txt
> ftp://ftp.itojun.org/pub/paper/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful- 
> 00.txt


Ok.  I have read some of those (we'll skimmed anyway).

We'll add that in then - I have no problems with it, IPv4 mapped is  
horrible anyway ;)

Also - we should add a reference to those docs (and any others) into  
nc6 somewhere...either as URL's in a README, or the entire documents in  
docs.

Regards,
Chris