[ds6] Using NC6 as a circuit level proxy between IPv6 and IPv4
Chris Leishman
chris at leishman.org
Sat May 10 02:37:02 CEST 2003
On Saturday, May 10, 2003, at 01:24 AM, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
> yes, absolutely. excuse me, i am working on a major refactoring of nc6
> io_stream code (in order to intoduce the support of tunneling, logging
> and
> ssl) and i hoped to be able to merge my code before next release.
> unfortunately i have not finished that work yet :-(
Cool. Sorry I haven't been doing much recently...been kinda busy.
I've started doing some work for the Oulu University Secure Programming
Group (http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/ouspg/), which is good but busy.
But if you want to bounce ideas off me, then just send em my way :)
> i'll do it tomorrow when i'll be back from the webbit mega-event. in
> the
> meanwhile, could you please test the current cvs sources to see if
> there
> are some problems for the 0.5 release?
I think everything in there is ok....I've been using it moderately
often.
>> Please be aware, however, that it's not very efficient proxying data
>> this way. There's unnecessary overhead in creating a new nc6 process
>> for every new connection and also in multiple copies of the data as it
>> is passed between the two processes. Perhaps one day we'll add in
>> better 'redirection' support.
>
> IMVHO, we should add this redirection ASAP.
Yeah, I've thought about this before - the trick is figuring out a nice
clean way to specify it on the command line. The actual code part
should be trivial.
Regards,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.deepspace6.net/pipermail/ds6/attachments/20030510/f9455bfb/PGP.bin
More information about the ds6
mailing list